|
Man, and the realization of his purpose |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A guide to the doing of good and to a full and happy life |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
by Abraham Adar |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Observing The Commandments. A divine process for the realization of man's purpose.
In order to begin the walk towards the proper observance of a commandment, we should first be aware of its characteristics. The need for this, stems from the lack of a straightforward and clear definition of "commandment" in the bible. On the other hand, there exists a list of 613 divine orders, which the Jewish religion determined as commandments. Commandment's characteristic points
I was able to discover only three such declarations, these being:
In effect, these three
declarations contain two fundamental things: Love and positive
creation
Further details regarding the proper observance of
commandments Comprehending the commandment's essence
Crossing from a divine decree to a commandment:
Observing a commandment cannot be commanded
A commandment is a consciously recurring, creative
expression of the doing of Good, at increasingly high levels, activated by a
person's free will and desire, with God's encouragement.
It has already been noted in the previous pages that properly carrying out a commandment is a conscious and creative act of love, or as we also know, a conscious and creative performance of true Good, in which love is the means of bringing Good into expression. Therefore, each commandment has to contain a significant component of love. Could it be that we are talking about the performance of just one wise meta-commandment, that is love, and the commandments God bestowed on us are a certain collection from the sum of all possible acts of love? This, until man develops and realizes this meta-quality, which whose actualization man will complete the performance of the remaining expressions of Good or acts of love. It seems there is a basis for these suppositions. Let us examine, according to the Pentateuch, whether by observing the commandment of love, we will have observed all the commandments. From Deuteronomy 11:13, we are familiar with the following quotation: "And it shall come to pass, if ye shall hearken diligently unto my Commandments which I command you this day, to love the LORD your God". This quote shows that God considers the observance of the commandment to love God, not as the observance of a single one, but as the observance of the lion's share of the commandments, or even of them all. In the chapter titled "Loving God" , it is proved that loving God is equal to 'serving God', yet 'service of God' contains the observance of all the commandments. Hence, this conclusion also proves the truth of my supposition. I suppose that if we search the Pentateuch carefully, we shall locate additional, similar quotations.
In summary,
it can be said that we have to accept the principle that we
are talking about the observance of a single basic commandment,
which is the Commandment of love. The symbolic act, as an impressive means of improving the observance of the wise commandment The matter at hand comes to remind us of the essence and to bring to its observance. The frequency of its performance can be maximized by fitting the symbol. In repeating the symbolic action, we may find ourselves performing the commandment automatically. In order for the symbolic action to achieve the desired effect, three conditions must be satisfied, these being: familiarity with the symbol, familiarity with the "essence" and the existence of an associative link between the two. The Pentateuch makes frequent use of this type of activity. The "Tzizith" commandment defines the principle of such an activity, by means of the following quote: " And it (the Tzizith) shall be unto you for a fringe, that ye may look upon it, and remember all the commandments of the LORD, and do them" (Numbers 15:39). Before you are some symbols and their essence:
I am unsurprised at the Pentateuch's use of symbolic actions, especially for the improvement and expression of love, which on the one hand is a quality whose expression is difficult, yet on the other hand, holds the key to the realization of man's purpose. Unfortunately, the Jewish religion furnished man with neither the essence of the wise commandment, nor with the associative connection between the commandment and the symbol. This way, for example, the laying of the Tefillin, the glancing at the Mezuzah and the covering with the Tzizith, were all turned into meaningless and purposeless activity.
It is indeed clear to us, how we ought to act in order to properly observe such a commandment, yet I cannot refrain from presenting you with a wonderful story that will clarify its proper performance, from the emotional aspect as well. I heard this story from Rabbi Zaltzberg, one of Tel-Aviv's well known Rabbis, at the time of a young man's celebration of his coming of age (Bar-Mitzvah the time in which he is ripe for the duty of carrying out the commandments). The Rabbi told that in a certain city, a father strolled with his son. The son met a needy man asking for charity, and donated him a certain sum, of his own desire to do so and continued on his way. Suddenly, the youth remembered something, returned to the pauper and again, gave more charity. When his father enquired why he made two contributions, the boy responded: The first time I contributed due to an inner need of doing so, the second time I did it because God ordered it. This story encapsulates an important truth, and I feel a renewed excitement, whenever I recall it. Each of us would do well to dedicate some thought to this wonderful example and to turn this attitude into a sacred principle of moral behavior. We see the first act of charity as a distinctive and genuine expression of love towards the other, whereas the second act of charity constitutes a distinctive and genuine act of love towards the divine as gratitude and appreciation for the encouragement received for performing this good deed.
We see another aspect of this genuine expression - namely, it
cannot be that a person will express sincere love towards the
other, without also expressing, in parallel, love towards his
Creator, and vice-versa. It could be said that the first act of
charity is that which brought about a recollection of the
Creator, which in turn, awakened love towards Him and its
subsequent action. A person ought to act in a similar fashion, as regards anything requested by God. The action will be performed, approximately this way: Initially, to comprehend, then to perform, to enjoy the reward this action bestows, and only following that, to thank and express love towards Him for what He ordered and encouraged us to perform. For it would be neither sincere, nor proper, to bless, sanctify and show gratitude towards God and express love towards Him, for the miserable life a person experiences in his status of a "sinner". |
The value of a man should be seen in what he gives and
not in what he is able to receive.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||